I like poetry. Ever since coming
across those lines from A Child's Garden of Verses by R.L. Stevenson
(about the pail by the wall being half full of water and stars) it
has had a place in my life - been important to me. But I hardly get
to any poetry readings these days. Mostly, this is because of
restrictions imposed my neurologically-challenged brain that isn't
easily able to give the kind of sustained concentrated focus needed.
But I have to admit that my preference is also to have a particular kind of one-on-one relationship with a poem that you get
when it is just you and the words on a page. I often hear it said
that a poem only really comes alive when it is spoken aloud, and it
is quite true that to speak it aloud often tests where a poem is or
isn't working; and it is true that when a poet has the gift of being
able to deliver their words well, then it is a fine thing to hear
them. I know one of whom it is said that he could read from a
telephone directory or a Tesco's till receipt and make it sound like
poetry (and perhaps, for the duration of his performance of such, it
might become so). But there are good, even famous poets who don't do
this well, and then I would prefer to meet their work on the page.
Perhaps I am making a virtue of
a necessity. However good the poem on the page, one doesn't have the
buzz of conviviality that comes from a room full of people sharing
the experience. I have recently been in rooms full of people
because they were occasions which I couldn't bear to miss: the
book launch of a dear friend was one and the wedding of my youngest
brother was another. The commonplace business of engaging in
conversation in a crowded room, especially where there is ambient
noise, has become something I can - almost - no
longer do. It does something to the wiring in my brain that is hard
to describe, but many PeopleWithME will know and recognise. Clearly
there was a time when I managed better than I do now. But for now I
will (have to) carry on treading the path of acceptance. Does this sound
boring?
I am not bored. I have almost never
been bored, even as a temp when typing figures all day on a manual
typewriter or sitting in a classroom listening to the depressed
geography supply teacher drone about where we got our wheat, cocoa
and meat from. I took in none of the facts (I seldom did) but I
remember everything about the teacher: how carefully he combed the
few oily strands across his bald head, the texture of his tweed-like
suit that picked up on the colour of his ginger sideburns, the
earnest expression, as though there might have been something hidden
in the dreary litany of facts that he would have liked to reveal to
us. I remember how dust gathered in the corners of the large
classroom windows that you could only open by using a long pole with
a metal hook at the end, and the blackboard where there was always
the ghost of something written in chalk, even once it had been rubbed
out. I must have been paying attention - to something or someone. I
still do. And the other day I read Billy Collins who said, while the
novelist is banging on his typewriter, the poet is watching a fly on the windowpane. I don't think the one activity necessarily excludes
the other, and however many flies you watch there is no substitute
for writing words on paper (or screen). But it did give me the
sense, or remind me, that the act of witnessing and paying attention
means something and gives power and substance. The pail is still
full of water and stars.
***
